Data Envelopment Analysis Usage to Measuring Relative Efficiency of Physical Education Departments

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc of Sport Managemrnt, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Sport Managemrnt, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. of Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: Despite significant advances in the design of performance appraisal frameworks and systems in recent years, many organizations still rely on traditional metrics. The present study aimed to measure the relative efficiency of physical education departments of Ministry of Education in Tehran through a Data Envelopment Analysis approach.
Method: In addition to identifying and determining the input and output indices of regions, an appropriate model of Data Envelopment Analysis was presented to evaluate their performance, as well as ranking efficient and inefficient regions and units and providing solutions to improve inefficient regions. Input indicators were the ratio of student to physical education teacher, the budget of physical education department, the number and surface area of sports halls at the disposal of the department, and output indicators included the number of sports competitions held by the department, provincial and national trophies won in competitions as well as national and international athlete students of each region. After designing the research model and collecting the data, BCC, CCR and Anderson-Peterson output- and input-oriented models were analyzed using DEA-SOLVER LV software.
Results: Based on the results, the highest, lowest and average indices of inputs and outputs obtained. The results showed that 11 out of 19 regions under study in 2017 were efficient and 8 were inefficient.
Conclusion: It is necessary that the degree of changes needed to make efficient the inefficient units be determined by modeling the efficient departments. The results of this study provide useful insights for the development of sports service improvement policies in Physical Education Departments of Ministry of Education in Tehran.

Keywords


Adabi Firouzjah, J., Mozafari, A., Hadavi, F. (2014). Measuring the efficiency of provincial administrations of the ministry of sport and youth by using data envelopment analysis, Research in Sport Management & Motor Behavior, 3 (6): 61-78.
Alexander, C., Busch, G., Stringer, K. (2003). Implementing and interpreting a data envelopment analysis model to assess the efficiency of health systems in developing countries, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 14 (1): 49-63.
Alirezaei, M., Alizad, N. (2000). Evaluating banks' performance using Data Envelopment Analysis, proceedings of the second conference on performance evaluation of executive devices, the third Shahid Rajaee festival: 2 (30- 39).
Alirezaei, M., Jafari, S. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis, an effective tool in performance assessment of executive devices, proceedings of the second conference on performance evaluation of executive devices, management and planning organization of Iran: 70- 84.
Askari, A., Charkhkar, M. (2015). Determining and evaluating relative performance indicators of tax departments of Tehran and provincial provinces using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach, Tax research paper, 26 (75): 35- 62.
Azar, A, Motmeni, A. (2004). Productivity measurement in production companies by Data Mining Models (DEA), Journal of Daneshvar Behavior, 11 (8): 41- 54.
Bhat, Z.U.H., Sultana, D., Dar, Q.F. (2019). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA): Approach in sports. Journal of Sports Economics & Management, 9, 82-109.
Byars, L.I & Rue, L.W. (2008). Human resource management: 9th Edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
Daneshvar, M. (2006). Designing and explaining the performance evaluation model of Dana Insurance branches using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) technique, MSc in industrial management (operations research trend), Tarbiat Modares University.
Dehkhoda, A. (2006). Dictionary, Tehran, university of Tehran, Dehkhoda Dictionary.
Emami Meibodi, A. (2000). Efficiency and productivity measurement principles. Journal of Business Studies and Dynamics, second edition, 43- 60.
Fan, M., Liu, F., Yi, Q., & Gong, B. (2023). Does high investment lead to high efficiency in Chinese Super League clubs?, Applied Economics Letters, 30:4, 548-552.
Farrel, M. J. (1957). The measurements of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistical Society. 120, 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Forouzan, F. (2016). Development of swimming pool performance evaluation model, MSc Thesis, Payame Noor University.
Fortuna, T. (2000). A DEA model for the efficiency evaluation of nondominated paths on a road network European. Journal of operation research, 121(3):549-558.
Hasanzadeh, N. , Moharramzadeh, M. , Naghizadeh-Baghi, A. and Nobakht Sareban, F. (2025). Loyalty Pattern of Formula One Fans in Iran. Research in Sport Management and Marketing6(3), 1-11. doi: 10.22098/rsmm.2024.15851.1409
Gafari, A, Ehsani, M., Momeni, M. (2009). Designing a performance evaluation system for Iranian schools of physical education and sport sciences. Journal of sport management, 1 (2): 51- 71.
Goharrostami, H. R., Molaeinejad, M., & Ramezaninejad, R. (2019). Analysis of performance dimensions in general directorate of general administration of sport and youth in Guilan province based on Balanced Scorecard Model. Journal of human resource management in sport. 6(2), 345-356.
Hammond, C J. (2003). Efficiency in the provision of public services: a data envelopment analysis of UK public library systems. Applied Economics, 34: 649 -657.
Heidarinejad, S. (2003). Explaining and determining productivity indicators in physical education and sport sciences colleges and departments of public universities and designing a performance improvement model, PhD dissertation in sport management, Teacher Training University, Tehran.
Hosseini, S., Soori, A. (2007). Estimating bank of Iran's performance and its factors, Economic Research, 25 (7): 127- 155.
Kasaei, M., Khabazi, M. (2000). Performance evaluation of service organizations using Data Envelopment Analysis Method, third-party Quality Management Systems (3), 32- 43.
Ketabi, S., Emami, A. (2013). A competitive optimal exploration tool for strategic throat analysis, Management Research in Iran. 17 (1): 149- 168.
Kooper, V., Siford, L., Ten, K, (2008). Data Envelopment Analysis, models and applications, translated by Seyed Ali Mir Hosseini, Tehran, first edition, Amirkabir University Press.
McMillan, M L., and Chan, W H. (2006).University efficiency: a comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods, Education Economics, 14 (1):1- 30.
Mehregan, M R. (2004). Quantitative models in performance evaluation of organizations, Tehran University Press, First Edition: 15-35.
Miragaia, D. A. M., Ferreira, J.J.M., Vieira, C. T. (2024). Efficiency of non‑profit organizations: a DEA analysis in support of strategic dDecision‑making. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15:3239–3265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01298-6
Mohammad Gaafar, H., Safania, A.M., Hosseini, E., Mohammad Alipour, Gh. (2015). Evaluation of the performance of sports teams at the federation of sports associations using Data Envelopment Analysis. 4th national conference student sports science. University of Shahid Beheshti. P. 44.
Mohammadi, A., Mirghafoori, M., Mirfakhredini, H. (2009). Evaluation of relative performance of public hospitals in Yazd province using Data Envelopment Analysis model. Journal of Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of medical sciences, 17 (2), 67- 75.
Momeni, M. (2014). New topics in operations research. Tehran: Agah publications.
Niu, H., Zhang, Y. (2021). The proportion of sports public service facilities based on the DEA model in colleges and universities, Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte, 27. https://www.scielo.br/j/rbme/a/pyYHkDfMcB9w3YSk4LYTL6R/
Rahimi, G. (2006). Performance evaluation and continuous improvement of organization, journal of Tadbir. 173, 41-45.
Rasool Roeisi, M. (2005). Measuring the efficiency of provinces of the country using Data Envelopment Analysis Technique, first national conference on productivity and development, east Azerbaijan management and planning organization, 2-4.
Ren, P., Liu, Z. (2021). Efficiency evaluation of China’s public sports services: A three-stage DEA model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 10597. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010597
Safari, O, Ahmadirad, M. (2018). Investigating the barriers to investment and private sector participation in Fars Province sport. Journal of sport sciences, 10 (30), 11- 20.
Sheykhzade, R., Bahramzade, M. (2008). The role of strategic human resource management in promoting business performance, monthly management consultant, Iranian management consulting association. No. 18.
Skandari, S., Amirtash, A., Safania. A. (2018). Using Data Envelopment Analysis to determine impact factor of efficient sport organizations on inefficient sport organizations. Applied research in sport management, 6 (3), 33-41.
Soleimani, B., Ashraf, F. (2018). Efficiency appraisal of provincial volleyball associations in Iran using DEA, Journal of sport management and motor behavior, 14 (27): 103-114.
Soteriou, A., Stavrinides, Y. (2000). An internal costumer service quality Data Envelopment Analysis Model for bank branches, international journal of bank, 18: 246-252.
Terrien, M., and W. Andreff. (2020). Organizational efficiency of National Football Leagues in Europe. European Sport Management Quarterly 20 (2): 205–224.
Torkashvand, A R., Mostafaei, A. (2004). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis in organizational modeling process, management and development community, 6 (21):, 38- 53.
Wu, D., Yang, Z., Liang, L. (2006). Using DEA–neural network approach to evaluate branch efficiency of a large Canadian bank. Expert systems with applications, 31: 108–115.
Zhang, S., Ouyang, T., Wei, S-Y., Liang, B-B., & Zhu, J-M. (2022). Research on sustainable development of competitive sports in China based on PSR and DEA model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13:925909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925909