Identifying and Prioritize the Multiple Roles of Government in the Process of Sports Industry Privatization

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor in Sport Management, Faculty of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

2 Ph.D. Sport Management, Lecturer at Farhanghian University ,Zanjan ,Iran

10.22098/rsmm.2022.1794

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to identify and prioritize the multiple roles of the government in the process of privatization of sports.
Methods:The current research is of mixed type (qualitative and quantitative) and in terms of practical purpose and data collection method, it was field. The data collection tool in the qualitative part of the research was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative part, a researcher-made questionnaire (taken from the qualitative results, Reliability α=0.794 ). The research sample was selected from experts in sports management, economics, politics, management and people familiar with privatization issues in a targeted way(N=220). Friedman's test was used to rank the roles of the government in the privatization of sports. All statistical analyzes were performed by Excel and SPSS 23.
Results: In general, 74 components, 18 dimensions and 5 variables were identified. Among the five identified roles, the role of drafting regulations with an average of 3.38 in the first priority, the political role with an average of 3.17 in the second priority, the managerial-executive role with an average of 3.05 in the third priority, the economic role with an average of 2.76 in the fourth priority and the cultural role ranked fifth with an average of 2.63.
Conclusion: According to the results, it is suggested that the government take into account the multiple roles identified and the priority level of each of them by creating a specialized department for the privatization of sports within the structure of the Ministry of Sports.

Keywords


  1. References

    1. Afsay A(2012). The Study of Managerial Obstacles to Privatization of Professional Football League Clubs, Master's Thesis, The Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Mobarakeh Branch.Iran.
    2. Ahmadi A, Mohammadzadeh H, Tartybian B (2010). The Study of Obstacles and Problems in The Privatization of Sport From The Owners of Private Clubs’ View in Urmia. First National Conference on City and Sports .www.civilica.com. NCCS01_013.
    3. Alidost-Ghahfarokhi Ebrahim(2011). Analysis of Obstacles of Executions of Article 44 of Constitution in Elite Sport of Islamic Republic of Iran, Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Tehran.Iran.
    4. Amiri, M., Nayyeri, S., Saffari, M., Delbari Ragheb, F. (2014). Explanation and Prioritization of Barriers to Privatization and Private Sector Participation in Sport Development. Journal of Sport Management, 5(4), 83-106. doi: 10.22059/jsm.2014.36222
    5. Bahram Y, Karimi K(2006). Description of Job Creation of The Private Sport Clubs, First National and International Congress on Sport Management. 7(1).
    6. Cloud wei Ch.(2009). Privitization and Development, Theory, Methods and Observations, Translated by Mohammad. Saffar, Published by Nashre Etrat no, Tehran.
    7. Elahi A.(2008). Obstacles and Strategies for |The Economic Development of the Football Industry in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Doctoral dissertation, Physical Education and Sport Sciences Faculty. University of Tehran .
    8. Farahani A, Alidost-Ghahfarokhi E, Derakhshande- Ghahfarokhi ST(2015). Investigating Problems and Obstacles of Private Sport Clubs of Shahre- Kord City, journal of sport management,; 7(1) :53-67.
    9. Gharekhani H (2015). Designing Model of Obstacles in the way of participation of private sector in the football industry of Iran, 8th international congress of physical education and sport science, Tehran, Iran.
    10. Hemati-Nejad Mehrali. Goharrostami ,Hamid-Reza. Hosseini ,Seyyed Sajjad.(2017)."Requirements for Privatization of Iran Pro League Football Clubs". Physical Education  of Student . vol (1). pp33-39.
    11. Holt M. (2007)The Ownership and Control of Elite Club Competition in European Soccer and Society,8 (1): 50-67.
    12. Jady Zaidi bin Hassim, Wan Syazana Akmal Wan Roslan(2015). " Privatization        of Sport Leagues in Malaysia : Governance Structure and Stakeholders Right " . International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 6, Issue 4 . pp124-129.
    13. Javad M Ch, Moradi M R, Qahfarokhi-Norouzian S, Jafari A(2013). An Investigation of Economic Barriers Affecting Foreign Investment Attraction in the Islamic Republic of Iran Football Industry, Journal of Sport Management; 17(2):147-129.
    14. Karimzadeh E, Nozari V, Shir-ali M(2014). The Effect of Privatization of Sports Centers on the Growth Trend of Some Sports Indicators of Females in the Province of Isfahan, International Journal of Sport Studies;4 (2):168-173.
    15. Kianmarz Y.(2008) Analysis of Economy of Sport Industry in Iran, 6th International Congress on Physical Education and Sport Science, Kish, 3-9 .
    16. khosrawi-Zadeh E, Bahrami A, Haghdadi A(2015). Participation and Investment Obstacles of Private Sector in Sport of Markazi State, Sport management studies . 24 p: 207-222.
    17. Naseh Mahtab , Ghahreman Tabrizi, Kurosh , Sharifian Ismail (2014), Comparison of the views of cooperative experts and sports management experts on the development of small and medium-sized sports enterprises in the form of cooperatives, Journal of Sports Management, Volume 6, Number 3, pp. 459-47
    18. Michic J. Oughton C(2004). Competitive Balance in Football: Trends and Effects. FGRC Research Paper, 3 (2):24-32.
    19. Mohammadi, Moghani, H , Kashef Seyed Mohammad , Honari Habib , Gharehkhani Hassan (2017). The Factor Analysis of The State's Political Role in Implementing The Privatization Policy of The Sports Industry. New Approaches to Sport Management, 4(13): 61-72.
    20. Padash D(2010). Prioritizing the Factors Contributing in The Privatization of Sports Clubs Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Science's, M A Thesis , University of Isfahan.Iran
    21. Rahimi G , Shakerian M, Zamani A (2013) . The Modern Views in Sport Facilities Development: the privatization Approach and the Role on Clubs Productivity, Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research ; 2(1), 80-85.
    22. Salimi Mehdi, Soltan-hoseini M, Nasr- Esfahani D(2014). Prioritization of Obstacles in The Way of Financial Support of Private Sectors for Sport According to Conclusion of Results of MADM Methods Using POSET Technique, journal of sport management. 21, 149-172.
    23. Shojaadin Roghayeh (2012) .Role of Government in Privatization Process (Comparative Study of Germany, China, Iran Experiences) M.Sc. Thesis, Allameh Tabatabaei University of Tehran, Faculty of Economy.
    24. Soleimani T, Gharekhani H, Saghi J, Fuladi-Heydarlu S(2015). Investigating Role of Economic Factors on Privatization of Sport From The Experts Point of View, 8th International Congress on Physical Education and Sport Science, Tehran.
    25. Welsh D, Fermond O (2011).Step By Step Privatization, Methods and Examples, Translated by: Studies Management and Planning, Published By Entesharat Etrat Chap.
    26. Wolfram M , John H(2006). An Introduction to The Sociology of Sports Mega-Events, The Sociological Review. 54 (2): 1-24.