Study Problems of Iranian Sports Management (Case Study of Track and Field Federation)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Islamic Azad University Qom Branch, Qom, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to study the Problems of Iranian Sports Management (Case Study of Track and Field Federation). Athletics is a kind of sport events which is one of the main sports around the world. According advance of other events, it would advance and it is a factor the index of public sports. Subjects consisted of 142 experts including athletes, coaches and "A" level instructors of this sport.
Methods: We used descriptive method in which a questionnaire produced and validity of questions measured by faculties of Physical Education, who were also expert in Athletics (Cronbach's Alpha= 93٪). Using descriptive methods, such as the Friedman test and Chi Square, the goals and hypothesis of research were analyzed.
Results: The findings revealed 9 challenging factors in Athletics of Iran. These challenges according to their importance includes: Lack of budget and financial facilities (Mean: 4.39) it is known as most important factor.  low attention of the media to Athletics (Mean: 4.31) lack of facilities and equipment (Mean:4.16) it is been located in the next grade, too Lack of talent identification(Mean:4.12) Lack of proper governance (Mean: 4.11) Low competitive events (Mean: 4.02) lack of qualified coaches and specialists(Mean:3.96) low level Athletics league (Mean: 3.89) it is been located in the next grade, and lack of talented athletes in the sport (Mean: 2.90) it is been located in the last challenge.
Conclusion: Development of athletes depended teamwork of all related organization including NOC, physical education organization and Track and Field Federation.   

Keywords


  1. References

    1. Alijani, A. (2002). A study on situation and Designing Talent Identification Index for Athletics in Iran, Journal of Research on sports science, 1(4), 1-23.
    2. Bell, w. (2019). Foundations of future studies: Human science for a new era, history, purposes, and knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    3. Bompa, T.O. (2018). in: Talent opportunity program.
    4. Bompa, T.O. (1997). Identifying the athletic talent and the planning of a term program. Talent Scouting National Coaches Convention of Canada.
    5. Dietz, T. (1987). Methods for analyzing data from Delphi panels: some evidence from a forecasting study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. (31), 79-85.
    6. Domon, P. & Sermons, A. (2019). The Effect of Congruence of Leadership Behaviors on Motivation Commitment and Satisfaction of College Tennis Player, Journal of Applied Psychology, August 3.
    7. Erffmeyer, R. C., Erffmeyer, E. S., & Lane, I. M. (1986). The Delphi technique: An empirical evaluation of the optimal number of rounds. Group & organization studies, 11(1-2), 120-128.‏
    8. (1989). Workplace justice and job satisfaction as predictors of satisfaction with union & management. Academy of Management Journal. 1-128.
    9. Ghafouri, F. (2003). The Determination of factors influencing the effects sport for all and Elite sport for Determining sport strategies of Iran. Phd Dissertation, Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University.
    10. Guthrie, M. (2003). Coaching track & field successfully. Human Kinetics.‏
    11. Jackson, J. (1991). Mass participation in physical recreation, Journal of recreation, 49(3), 33-40.
    12. Katz, D.M. (2004). Innovation in sport as functional concept for future, journal of sport psychological. 43(3), 43-65.
    13. khalil Abady, Gh. (1994). A survey on Motivations of participants of sport for all in Tehran. master thesis, university of Tarbit Moalem Tehran, Iran.
    14. Levesque, L. (1996). Factors influencing creativity in top executives. unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, M.
    15. Malina, R. M. (2001). Talent Identification and selection in sport, sport light. File://A:/talent/htm.
    16. Martino, J. (1983). Technological forecasting for decision making (2nd ). New York Elsevier.
    17. Siebert, T. (1990). is a historical chance missed? “Talent schools” for sports are at stake. Sport in Berlin.
    18. Snyder, C. J. (1990). The effects of leader behavior and organizational climate on intercollegiate coaches’ job satisfaction. Journal of Sport Management, 4(1), 59-70.‏
    19. Streliza, B. (2005). Relationships in Sport Sponsor Ship: a Marketing Perspective, unpublished doctoral degree dissertation, Faculty of management, University of Johannesburg.
    20. Tangen, J. O. (2004). Embedded expectations, embodied knowledge and the movements that connect: A system theoretical attempt to explain the use and non-use of sport facilities. International review for the sociology of sport, 39(1), 7-25.‏
    21. Thibault, Lucie. & Trevor, Slack. (1994). Strategic planning for non profit sport organization: Empirical Verification of framework, Journal of Sport Management. 8(3), 218-233.
    22. Vonstein, V. (2016). NSA Round Table 17: Talent Identification. New Studies in Athletics IAAF. 7(3), 19-23.
    23. Yazdan Panah, Mohammad Javad. (2003). A survey on turnover of Track and Field Federation of Iran between 1991-2000. master thesis, university of Tehran, Iran.
    24. Yong, G. K. (2019). sport sponsorship match–up Effect on Consumer Based Brand Equity : An Application of the Schematic information process. un published doctoral degree dissertation, Department of sport Management, Recreation management and Physical Education, Florida state university..